Remux vs bluray reddit. In the end it all comes down to your viewing experience.

Remux vs bluray reddit I generally prefer 1080p Blu-ray to 4k streaming due to compression artifacts from low bit rate of streaming. Theres been a few times when a superior master was used for a streaming/broadcast copy or the bluray was fucked up due to bad filtering and such leading to a webdl or even hdtv rip being superior. As the quality depends of the release, I will try to take one video as an example BluRay 4KLight DOLBY VISION/HDR10+ x265 10Bit 4 971 kb/s Vs HEVC/x265/h. 3 inch screen, though — you would have to sitting your face against the screen and actively pixelpeeping while pausing. Blu-Ray is not really compressed like streaming content. I bet they had to shrink the file size to fit the movie in the disc to save on costs and that the actual remux file is much higher quality, but much larger in file size. Some (usually scene releases) will simply run it through generic "catch-all" settings for an encoder and you end up with a pretty good rip. BDRip - Encoded from the remux. I'm not a pixel peeper, so I do remux in DVDs and 1080 Blu-ray, but encode 4K down to about the same as 1080 size. Cosmos. I'd go for the NF web-dl or webrip for Black Mirror S04 as there are known issues with the blu ray mastering. Anything that is not a remux, is lossy, meaning it has been tampered with and compressed. ACC/VC-1/HEVC more to indicate the remux. I have a 4K TV. I've heard REMUX is the most original source quality you can get. But how different is that from a Web-DL as you'd think a direct download of a file would still be the best. When they produce a blu ray, they can take a 500GB file of a movie which can be a RAW file, and encode it down to fit onto a blu ray. I've heard that REMUX is the highest quality format for movies. Transparent BluRay encodes are around 60-70% of remux — much bigger and better encoded than WEB-DLs. x265-RARBG. BDRip implies the video track was encoded (probably with x264) to reduce size. TERMiNAL does some good work with releasing UHD HDR HEVC encodes around 20gb, which I find preferable to even BluRay Remux's. I have to knock the file size down at least a little to make this work. HEVC. You have an SDR display so just ignore HDR. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 3 is a remux of the 1080p Blu-ray Disc 4 is a 1080p encode from the 4K Disc 5 through 8 are the 1080p Its all about the bitrate. For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. But, I only use MakeMKV to make the full disc backup and then manually create the MKV from the blu-ray folders on the hard drive using eac3to and MKVtoolnix. BluRay is simply the media source. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. Year. There is no correct answer. That all changed with UHD Blu-Ray which introduced newer codecs. Unfotunately, my storage and bandwidth capacity doesn't allow for that. 2160p. H. Also have to tried comparing the remux with the BD encode? While i agree with what you stated, i doesn't appear to me that you answered my question. Follow this order: 1080p bluray > 4k web-dl > 4k bluray > 1080p web-dl. 3 Mb/s IMAX 2160p Remux will be purely movie and nothing shit. lol has downloadable IMAX, iTunes, Remux, 3D, Dolby Vision, and even 60 up to 144 FPS movie conversion content! (Also has Dolby Atmos audio) Of course, it won't show in the searches because it's a pirate site that's why you gotta research more like on youtube. 5gb still looks sweet Remux is short for Remultiplex. 1 HEVC REMUX-FraMeSToR I was wondering, is there much of a difference between let's say a 70gb remux compared to something like a decent 20-30gb encoded bluray rip? Is it really worth the extra space these files take up when viewed on a nice big screen, or is there a point of diminishing returns if the encode is good enough? also forgive me if this question has been I'm looking at 2 files, one of them is a REMUX which is 140GB and the other is x265 less than 10GB. Idk what this other guy is saying. Video quality is significantly worse. It's between the original series and the remix/blu-ray where the real deal breakers are born. 1-ShocK - 21. 5. In your example, DD+ means Dolby Digital +, which is a lossy codec. As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. 55Gb The… Skip to main content Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I just bought a new TV recently and were wondering what is the best choice for quality or perception between HDR10+ and the remux version. If file size is not an issue, what will give me the best quality: Movie. x265 is an encode using the h265 247 votes, 119 comments. 265. All that said, in general if done by a skilled encoder, an encode from a Blu-ray is generally going to be higher quality than a Web-DL. Reply reply   Nikt0 / OFT : For small size x264 Bluray encodes specifically all his encodes has 5700 kbps video bitrate (which is decent) and around 15k movies from him which basically cover almost every mainstream movies ever released from old to new ones PlayHD: they are from FL and they release bluray remux to 1080p/720p x264 bluray encodes If you were watching it on a big screen, there's absolutely a difference between a BluRay (encode) and WEB-DL. The runtime printed on the box states the 4k is 394 minutes and the standard is 456, so just slightly over an hour longer. 3gb while the remux is 27. Blu-rays are typically pressed on either a BD-25 (25GB) or BD-50 (50GB) disc -- 32GB per film is the average size of a blu-ray according to averages taken from various people's remux libraries. Amazon web-DL are generally pretty good. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been reencoded and there is loss of quality, while 'remux' means it is lossless. In my process, the backup process takes much longer (30+ minutes per disc) than the remux process (~10 minutes per disc). I did comparing tests with Remux, HDB internals, scene encodes and 5,6,7 GB 1080p HEVC encodes and all looks the same Your word means nothing in this discussion. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. I think TGx is more reputable, but the BEN version has IMAX, Dolby Vision, and HDR10 PLUS but I don't need all the extra audio tracks of Italian and Spanish. DTS 42GB… What would be the best release group for a 4K REMUX collection? Is DV REMUX always better than HDR REMUX? For example, between the two below torrents, which one would you pick? Tenet 2020 UHD BluRay 2160p DTS-HD MA 5. Also keep in mind that sometimes files have to be encoded a certain way depending on the device you're playing back on (For example, playing back an mkv directly on an LG OLED requires DTS audio and Dolby Vision video to be remuxed to play correctly) Resolution-wise the 4K disc wins out too, though the standard Blu-ray is no slouch. If you are more of extras loving guy like deleted scenes or making of movie or any edited scenes etc then go for full Bluray. Personally I think it's worth doing remux and preserving highest quality--as technology (and storage prices) improve, you'll be glad you didn't cut corners and compress/reduce your files. If bit rates are ok for a 4k video web-dl is the way to go. A remux is when you rip a Blu-ray/DVD without transcoding the video. AVC. REMUX is the best quality you can get This is usually true, but not always. The remix/blu-ray set removed scenes (mostly, if not all, scenery) and modified sound effects and start/stop positions of songs, and in some places, changed songs entirely. Lots and lots of them on remuxes if you know what to look for. true. DTS As I've read that remux is like the best you can get as its directly from the likes of a bluray without any alterations just being put into a . Since I dint have an HDR TV I also SDR convert to BT. 2023. This is the amount of data sent to your screen every second. Using a REMUX or a Complete BluRay RIP is best for encoding a movie with any codec, be it H. A disc and a remux will always be 1:1 in both video and audio quality. Question Interstellar. For a while now I've been using Handbrake, but I've got a few questions First, what is the difference between remux and re-encode? The list of low quality Blu-ray encoders is long and growing every month. Collection Management GUI: Zidoo, Dune HD, and Zappiti has nice collection GUI. I use FGT, HDCLUB, BLUHD, BTN, NOGRP, FraMeSToR, TRiToN, CiNEPHiLES and GHD. 1080p Blu-ray is ok too, Blu-ray is usually far more better at audio quality tho. DTS-HD. I can't say which source it is per the rules but recently I found the amazon web-dl of the show was far better than the bluray-remux. There is movement throughout the soundscape and beefy bass when Heyo, like everyone I've been sort of scrambling since Rarbg shut down. I keep both. HDR or not, the video will play the same on an SDR display. BDRemux would mean the video, audio and subtitles were simply put into a Matroska container without any alteration (so no loss of quality). Reply reply Blu-Ray Menu: Dune HD and Zappiti have better BR menu engine than Zidoo. Same with audio. QXR encodes the video, lowering the quality to make it smaller. 264 or H. HDR10. The other smaller files are compressed and lower quality. The Dolby Atmos soundtrack (which is offered on both standard Blu-ray and 4K) is rich and dynamic. BluRay. Remux means the data has been copied over to a new container (eg mkv) without re-encoding and therefore preserving the original quality. BluRay - Vague terminology, can be used for either a full bluray, remux or encoded release. A. There are more variables than that, such as encoding settings. The reason why I’ve put 4k web-dl before 4k bluray is that 4k web-dl has more than enough bandwidth for a 1080p display so 4k bluray will be overkill. Donc pour un film, je peux obtenir du Bluray-1080p, du WEBDL-1080p (qui est pire que le Bluray) ou du remux-1080p Je sais que… It used to be that you could pretty much garuantee that a blu-ray remux was H. The fact that "x264" appears in the name tells me someone re-encoded the Blu-Ray using x264. REMUX. Anyway, most people avoid remuxs unless they have space to kill because a good bluray encode can be as good or almost as good with significant space savings. Not looking for a discussion about size vs effectiveness ala Randy in South Park about his ppsize, just trying to get input from others like me about where you're getting your needs fulfilled now (public sites, not We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Remuxes are exact bluray quality. I’d advise getting the remux, but if you’re looking for the absolute highest quality version of Apocalypse Now you might have better luck looking for the 200gb dcp remux or 1 tb 4k prores Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a remux vs. olamovies. If you do your own high-quality encodings, I have found that you can shrink both 1080p BluRay and 4K BluRay down to about half their Remux size (on average) without any visual quality loss. a high quality encode. A "Blu-ray Remux" traditionally refereed to someone ripping a Blu-Ray, stripping out any unwanted extras, like foreign subtitles audio, then muxing the audio and video streams in an mkv container. Edit: Not sure why the downvotes, a webrip (as opposed to a webdl) is a recording of a stream, it's a re-encode of a re-encode. I have a 4K HDR OLED TV. You may "prefer" the results of their tweaks but it is not what the original creator intended (the film's editor) Editor's don't prefer Blu-ray errors. FGT and EVO (Blu-ray rips) are banned from many trackers because they are trash. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Probably this Blu-ray comment from Kalroth 4y ago still applies… BluRay is simply the media source. dhmmcxa fwow yxtbg cglmlo ljykr mdrk rehnpm ltnummv jcyqy qdi emljmwn yakpce bmfni mveyh odwojq