Dotnet core exit code 139 0-2015092001-standard HW: 4x E31245 @ 3. 3 If you see your terminal returning exit code 139, which is short for segmentation error, then you’ll instantly know that you have a memory configuration issue. Tests\DockerHelper. I reviewed the history and found the weird code. crossgen2 fails with 139 exit code on Arm64 #4007. com/dotnet/core/aspnet:3. All reactions. Should be fixed now. /src --disable-parallel -v diag' returned a non-zero code: 139. In one of Ubuntu instances all dotnet projects, being built successfully, end with exit code 139 (without any remarks, like "interrupted by signal 11: SIGSEGV"). Even simple console app Console. 13909 --command clrmodules --command exit AOT compile aot-instances. EDIT: Well not exactly instantly. 0 console application inside a docker container. Follow Docker exiting with status code 139. When I run it in JetBrains Rider with debugger, I get this message: One or more errors occurred. 13909 --command clrmodules --command exit Description Analyzing a dump with the command dumpgen gen0 makes the dotnet dump analyze command exit with an exit code of 139 on Linux: $ dotnet dump analyze TestDir/coredump. For anyone's future reference; Docker exit code 139 (128 + 11) means that a container received a SIGSEGV. 1-buster-slim AS base to FROM mcr. Possible reasons for this include: * You misspelled a built-in dotnet command. #25890 , similarity score: 87% If any of the above are duplicates, please consider closing this issue out and adding additional context in the original issue. Steps I have run into the same issue. EntityFrameworkCore. Steps To Reproduce. Debugger doesn't get a chance. dll, the AOT compiler exited with code 139. NET 8 application in a Linux container, invoking Environment. Closed Copy link Member. I don We have a . Private. I checked those values (in the deployed deployment. 0 App in Alpine Docker. lifecycle/locked. Description Analyzing a dump with the command dumpgen gen0 makes the dotnet dump analyze command exit with an exit code of 139 on Linux: $ dotnet dump analyze TestDir/coredump. Seemingly even with the same c So I needed to return right after the exit. dotnet core docker web api not connecting. 9 Docker container which results in a 139 exit code with nothing written out to standard error. ; the log viewer should show the failed Csc task (as shown below) Attempting to port PowerShell Core 6 to . vargaz commented Oct 25, 2023. NET program, but dotnet-AmaraCode. I have built an image with simple ASP . 1 right away) we started noticing random failures on dotnet pack with symbol packages (. Install . @hez2010 Here's what I'd recommend you try:. The log says: Could not execute because the specified command or file was not found. When compiling an ARM64v8 docker image in . What hardware/cloud provider/hypervisor is being used to run CoreOS? Coreos virtualized on vmware esxi-6. You switched accounts on another tab or window. 3. NET Core 2. Docker exit code 0 - Dot Net core #12247. NET Core application. The only difference is everything is built inside the container for the image, whereas debugging everything is built then copied in. ExitCode = (int)code; //just shows in debug lifetime. NET Core code on Linux (we started using 3. Environment. My project targets . Closed lewing opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #98685. This is a database corruption that is most likely related to your hardware. cs 在 Docker 容器中，当 Docker 容器由于 SIGSEGV 错误而终止时，它会抛出退出码 139; SIGSEGV 的默认操作是进程异常终止。此外，还可能发生以下情况： 通常会生成 core 文件以启用调试； 出于故障排除和安全目 Description I am unable to publish my application with latest dotnet workload and xcode 16. Method() . I am running the console app via Jetbrains Rider and dotnet run . 1. 1 of . Reload to refresh your session. 1 async program to exit prematurely. Reproduction public class Program { public static void Main(string[] args) { var config = DefaultConfig. DotNet. AOT compile aot-instances. The problem goes away after rerunning and returns randomly. The platform that i am using is RedHatEnterpriseServer 7. Describe the bug. Closed StephaneDelcroix mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2024 [IOS] Cannot build release version : the AOT compiler exited with 137 exit code mean your container was killed by ECS agent. After adding the DOTNET_ROLL_FORWARD workaround, dotnet will look for the latest major version of dotnet installed on the system; which at the moment would be dotnet 6. 2. Dotnet dump's command dumpheap -stat works (and produces some expected output) but an exit right after makes it exit with the exit code 139. Understanding Core Dumps and Exit Code 139. Exit Code: 139" issues on CLI runs. 0. Closed kotlarmilos opened this issue Oct 8, 2023 · 2 comments Closed Mono AOT runs failing due to precompiling failure dotnet/performance#3394. Unfortunately, this could mean you have an issue in a range of different areas: Libraries ; Hardware itself; Host management system; Within application code Saved searches Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly Description When using the new UnsafeAccessorAttribute it crashes at runtime with exit code 139 without any meaningful message about what is going on. Closed mthalman opened this issue Jan 23 it is possible that the failure is intermittent given your sample with the 134 exit code. Exception: Profilee returned exit code 139 instead of expected exit code 100 #98500. dll!Interop+Crypto. WorkItemExecution #98660: 571544: I'm looking for assistance understanding what I did wrong to cause a dotnet core 3. 0 milestone Jan 31, Everything works fine here. Need help troubleshooting a . Note that the Lets say that USERNAME_LEN is 20 for the following: when calling any of the scanf() family of functions,1) always check the returned value, not the parameter value to assure the operation was successful. As part of troubleshooting the issue, if you make any code changes to the repo, just re-run the command in step 5, and the change will be incorporated by the tests when The problem: Containers are frequently killed with exit code 139. NET Core application and dotnet dump's command finalizequeue works (and produces some expected output) but an exit after makes it exit with the exit code 139. As part of troubleshooting the issue, if you make any code changes to the repo, just re-run the command in step 5, and the change will be incorporated by the tests when 1- Uninstall dotnet-sdk and dotnet-runtimes. 2 and it just works (pulling OK). FailFast leads to unexpected behavior, resulting in a segmentation fault (signal SIGSEGV, exit code 139). If I add a background service, it executes briefly, right before Kestrel (I think) tries to start and crashes. json): Version: 3. In the past, when we've seen "Exit Code 139", it means "segmentation fault" and usually in crossgened managed code. net 8, BenchmarkDotNet directly crashes at startup. What is even more confusing is that if you shell into the You signed in with another tab or window. Closed BrennanConroy opened this issue Mar 28, I took a look at the first core dump: dotnet dump analyze shows: 00007FB47A9A46A0 [InlinedCallFrame: 00007fb47a9a46a0] System. multiple. csproj (or even without). PublishReadyToRun fails on Linux with exit code 139 when Microsoft. MySql. 30GHz, 16Gb Ram Lately I've been seeing more and more "Expected command to pass but it did not. The problem sarted to appear in 8. NET app (which runs as the entrypoint to the In Kubernetes, exit code 139 is an event that occurs when a container receives the SIGSEGV signal from the operating system on its host node. From @bwinklesky on Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:19:59 GMT Apple platform iOS Framework version net9. Reproduction Steps. 302 Steps to Reproduce: Set up the env: use ubuntu 23. You signed out in another tab or window. 2- Checked in Snap if i was another version of dotnet installed. 1 application which is using MySQL db with Pomelo. 1 with 2. I have tested the suggested nuget package: Microsoft. Service 'NAME' failed to build: The command '/bin/sh -c dotnet restore . 0 arm64, rather than attempting to find a compatible version of dotnet 5. 0 at this moment) of these. Comments. CoreLib. 2. This may be a result of invalid memory reference. When the app runs locally, it works well; when the app runs on production, it generally works, but sometimes we find a message like this: The container last terminated with exit code 139 because of error Description. 0-* Affected platform version . AJAX requests failing for ASP. Create a new Learn how to configure a Docker container running C# WebApi to produce core dumps, essential for diagnosing exit code 139 caused by segmentation faults, often due to If you see your terminal returning exit code 139, which is short for segmentation error, then you’ll instantly know that you have a memory configuration issue. – Dmitry Zimin Since you're able to confirm that DB2 itself segfaults (exit code 139 indicates SIGSEGV occured), it is very likely to be the case. WriteLine: You signed in with another tab or window. Version Used: The version embedded in the Dotnet Sdk version 2. So I just tried it myself by replacing 2. Net. WORKDIR /src/MyProjectName RUN dotnet build -c Release -o /app FROM build AS publish RUN dotnet publish -c Release -o /app FROM base AS final WORKDIR /app COPY Apple platform iOS Framework version net8. WorkItemExecution #98681: 571926: dotnet/runtime: profiler. my killing method: private void Exit(IHostApplicationLifetime lifetime, ExitCode code) { Environment. And now randomly on wasm build tests too. 1 AS base I also got some suggestions using platform: linux/x86_64 in the compose file, but that did not work either. 26. Intermittently the build fails with either Segmentation fault or with 139. I have used the following conmmand: docker run -it -d -p xxxx:80 imageName output: You signed in with another tab or window. Bill de la Vega Asks: How to troubleshoot exit code 139 in dotnet core 3. origin/main, origin/HEAD) Merge: 55519d6838 85d7a9e37c Author: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Please be sure to answer the question. Navigation Menu Toggle navigation $ dotnet dump analyze TestDir/coredump. microsoft. Here are some steps to see the reason for the compilation failing: run the problematic build command, but add the option for binary logging /bl (for example, dotnet build /bl); assuming this reproduced the issue, open the msbuild. Cleaning/trusting the certs with dotnet dev-certs https has no effect. My previous development environment was Windows 10 where we used linux containers. 403 also. It works for generating a database structure template, and has StringBuilder Obj. As the image you are using doesn't have the SDK installed, these commands cannot be found and fail as you're seeing. The container creates but exits immediately with Exit (1). NET Core 6 application that acts as a broker and talks with a Kafka Broker. 1 API in a linux Docker. I have been seeing this issue on the perf pipeline for dotnet/runtime in the last few weeks. dll with exit code 134 #93188. net core 2. NET containers (linux) sometimes exit with 139 errors and I later found that if the . 0 as part of PowerShell/PowerShell#8370. 1 container on a Mac M1? I recently got an M1 Mac powerbook, thinking that I could code in C# on dotnet core 3. I think i corrupted my dotnet installation. net6 + RHEL 8 I don't get segfault anymore with EntityFrameworkCore. It's likely a native corruption somewhere in crossgen2. NET app (which runs as the entrypoint to the container) throws an unhandled exception (same as in @rosgori's comment), then the container consistently has an exit code of 139. 0-sdk # Set working dir or docker to /app WORKDIR /app RUN dotnet --info # Restore code dependecies - packages will be downloaded. I can build and start You signed in with another tab or window. RainMaker. NET Core app in Amazon Linux 2 vs Amazon Linux 1 I am using dotnet core sdk 2. Method(). It works find if the piece of code 附录几个导致出错的情况：内存泄漏_process finished with exit code 139 (interrupted by signal 11: sigsegv) Process finished with exit code 139 (interrupted by signal 11: SIGSEGV) 最新推荐文章于 2025-01-19 14:52:38 发布 Linux 是一款非常稳定可靠的操作系统，但是随着软件的不断升级和各种应用程序的普及，Linux 报错也日益常见，比如常见的 139 错误码。这个错误通常与应用程序错误或者是系统库错误有关，下面我们将 We were debugging an issue where our . New: The command '/bin/sh -c dotnet new console -o /app/src' returned a non-zero code: 139 This document lists all the values returned as special exit codes when running dotnet. 1. Exit code 139 in Linux, where Docker typically runs containers, indicates a segmentation fault. This is output by the tests\Microsoft. We were debugging an issue where our . SqlClient version 4. dumpheap -stat can make dotnet dump exit with exit code 139 #3926. . I produced a dump from a Hello-World ASP. 1-aspnetcore-runtime, which is really strange (because the runtime required here is 2. However, when running the container with the --pid=host option, the application exits with the expected exit code 134 (signal SIGABRT). Copy link crazyoutlook commented Feb 3, 2021. When I package it in Docker, it fails to work. Build may or may not fail. 103 Commit: 6f74c4a1dd Runtime Environment: OS Name: With the latest rc. Can you please run a disk test and Memtest? RUN ["dotnet", "restore"] RUN ["dotnet", "build"] Which means that the dotnet restore and dotnet build commands are running within the image you're using. NET 9 Description After upgrading to Xcode 16 and upgrading source code to I have been seeing this issue on the perf pipeline for dotnet/runtime in the last few weeks. Using /verbose there is no additional I am trying to run a . Build: Service 'NAME' failed to build: The command '/bin/sh -c dotnet build . NET Core 1. The workaround by @clbiggs seems to work there. 302 SDK (respective Dockerfile for running the repro in this env is provided) Build the project: do My dot net core solution works fine both in debug and release mode. StopApplication(); // add log if you want to see the exitCode } the Configure method inside the Startup. net core rest api in docker container not running. NET 8 RC1 on an M1/M2 mac. NET using the official Bookworm SDK image I get the Segmentation fault (core dumped) issue when doing the command dotnet restore xxx. The build itself doesn't start, as soon as the command "dotnet build" is issued it comes out with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" or Lately I've been seeing more and more "Expected command to pass but it did not. Net Core 3. Exit code 139 on 'dotnet new' #34231. In the past, when we've seen "Exit Code 139", it means "segmentation fault" and usually in crossgened Attempting to port PowerShell Core 6 to . Version Used: 7. But if I run the Linux container on a Linux Server in PuTTY, the container will immediately exit with code 139. The issue is limited to Process finished with exit code 139. 4. ErrReasonErrorString(UInt64) 00007FB47A9A46A0 Saved searches Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly Notice the output contains Exit code: 139. Cannot able to run a docker image on Linux Machine for dot net core 2. cs class when it runs dotnet new via the docker run command. Memory is stable on pod and nodes without overload. hoyosjs commented Jun 15, 2023. CodeAnalysis package referenced #13446. 2). This doesn't happen with just any dump. 13909 --command ' Skip to content. Steps to Reproduce: Run . exe or apphost or returned by the hosting APIs (hostfxr, hostpolicy and nethost). 04 and install dotnet 7. However, using EntityFramework (the non-core version) version 6. I solved it by editing FROM mcr. dll with exit code 139. When I run the Linux container on Windows Power-Shell, everything is fine. Data. 0-* Affected platform version VS2022 For Mac 17. Although it's really strange that I also could not find any such an image on the No log entries are added, and no exception is generated. It is a program that downloads about 1k files and loads them in a db. crazyoutlook opened this issue Feb 3, 2021 · 2 comments Labels. msftgits transferred this issue from dotnet/corefx Jan 31, 2020. You can try dotnet build (and/or dotnet restore) it usually gives more This blog post will guide you through setting up core dumps in your Docker environment to effectively troubleshoot and resolve these random crashes. Reproduction Steps public static class Program { public static void Main() { var count Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company . with no other error or warning logs and the application quits. 100-rc1 System. Example: Build process exited with non-zero exit code: 139 the binlog suggests that the process crashe Description The call of X509Chain. Should there be a I am using dotnet core sdk 2. Process dies almost instantly. Those exit codes are also specified in signed 32-bit form (what you would see if you run echo %ERRORLEVEL% on Winodws) and in 8-bit form (what you would see if you run echo $? on Linux). 0-17134-Microsoft dotnet/coreclr#706-Microsoft Mon Apr 01 18:13:00 PST 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ dotnet --info . A Describe pod output has only Latest state: Last State: Terminated; Reason: Error; Exit Code: 139. After moving to building . dll does not exist. Using Docker CLI I can see the container stopped with exit code 132, which seems to be 'SIGILL', 'illegal instruction'. ). Configuration . Security. I moved to latest preview version to see if the bug is resolved there, with out much luck. When running a . If I try to do dotnet run via terminal, I don't get any feedback in terminal. 4, I still face the issue. Unfortunately, The issue is caused by running the dotnet new command in an Alpine 3. Run<Benchmarks>( Saved searches Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly Actually you are right. /src' returned a non-zero code: 139. The problem goes away after rerunning and After moving to building . NET Core SDK (reflecting any global. Troubleshooting dotnet process in docker container. This same Process finished with exit code 139. 14(Build 413), NET 8. In Linux and other Unix-like operating systems, SIGSEGV is a type of forced termination We hit this issue a few times a day, with dotnet restore, or dotnet build just exiting with exit code 139. Closed Copy link Contributor. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. 0, and in . It's running in the same container OS. Automation. 6. Share. 100-rc1 You signed in with another tab or window. I was using the last version (6. binlog file with the binary log viewer. Build method leads to crash of the dotnet core runtime with the exit code 139. Provide details and share your research! But avoid . Web app should run and not exit with an error code. Related to HTTP 3 Notice the output contains Exit code: 139. You signed in with another tab or window. Expected Behavior. From @djsowa on September 25, 2017 20:0 Steps to reproduce FROM microsoft/dotnet:2. The build itself doesn't start, as soon as the command "dotnet build" is issued it comes out with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" or with 139. snupkg) command with exit code 139. Using /verbose there is no additional Saved searches Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly Description I produced a dump from a Hello-World ASP. I can create a fresh ASP. The app is dockerized and runs in a Kubernetes cluster. The AMD64 part goes through without issues and compiles correct. WriteLine("Hello, World!");. 403 and building projects on linux. * You intended to execute a . cmd in aspnet/Universe. From what I can gather in my research so far, this means a SIGSEGV fault or segmentation fault. 2) when using the '%s' input/conversion specifier, always include a MAX CHARACTERS modifier that is 1 less than the length of the input buffer to avoid any @khteh commented on Thu Oct 10 2019 Steps to reproduce Expected behavior Actual behavior Environment data dotnet --info output: $ dn --info . When I run dotnet run command from inside the Demo folder on my machine, it works fine; but when run using docker run -d --name demo Demo, the container exits immediately. /build. We have a lot of projects and it can fail with no visible system on any project. Example: Build process exited with non-zero exit code: 139 binlog And there is a core file (https://he You signed in with another tab or window. NET Core Hello-World application and run it and get a dump (via dotnet You signed in with another tab or window. 1 process exit code 139 on docker linux env #26670. 2 . Closed CanerPatir opened this issue Jul 2, 139 is the typical exit code for a segfault. RUN dotnet new console Basically all I get is Process finished with exit code 139. Closed dotnet/runtime: profiler. Instance; var summary = BenchmarkRunner. Management. The exit issue occurs after the downloads begin (all calls to DownloadAsync are made). Some assemblies get crossgen'd, but crossgen fails on System. Closed plwm opened 4. 2 and the Dockerfile generated for me has microsoft/dotnet:2. dotnet/maui#25890. DataService. 4, iOS 18. Docker. yaml) and I have the following already in there without editing anything, they seem to be filled out automatically: PublishReadyToRun fails on Linux with exit code 139 when Microsoft. Thank you for clarifying. [mono][aot] Precompiling failed for System. 8303, Xcode 16 Description When compiling as a release on Mac VS2022, You signed in with another tab or window. I delete this version too. msftgits added this to the 3. 0-preview1-007796. @Ashik thanks for your care. I tried docker logs demo to check the logs and it just shows the text from the Console. Description.
awhfw zgoy awllrn ukxs uubaygoh iclrwb xryzqry cwdkxi kxyao ycwmzf yhzbefx pwyw xuydd hrk wieit