Portra 400 price reddit. Labs just screw up the color every time.

Portra 400 price reddit 33 per roll, which means by bulk rolling TMax400 we get a ~25% discount on Kodak Film. Etc. What I find more bizarre is that 220 is more than twice the price of 120 Dec 11, 2023 · Somewhat tangential but potentially interesting is the information in the Portra data sheet on print granularity. And lomo 800 at 12 dollars a roll. Leica MP | Portra 400 | LLL Elcan 50MM. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Kodak Portra 400 — Pulled Natural Kodak Portra 400 — Pulled Subtle Kodak Portra 400 — Pulled Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - 1 vote and 15 comments Interestingly, I just bought a five pack of Portra 400 today, as well as one roll of Portra 800. Portra is a professional film because it's predictable and forgiving. Minolta X-700 / 50mn f1. An alternative is Kodak Ultramax - 3 rolls of 400 ISO film for 17e (even if I'm not a big fan of the Ultramax). It’s not but I’d use Gold if I don’t really want the look or shoot night stuff. Here you have some examples in daylight Portra 800 @400 iso Since you're doing landscapes, Ektar 100 would be better, but Portra 400 is acceptable, just tougher to work with in broad daylight. i let it go through as i assumed since it was under iso 800 it would be ok, but i just came across a post that said new ct scanners would destroy my film. Looking at B&H, a 36exp of TMax400 is $10. New users need a minimum of 25 combined karma with an account age of 30 days to post! In my estimation, the closest you'll get to replicating real Portra 400 is RNI films -- specifically the Portra 400 25% preset. Different, as many have observed, but not a huge difference. 8 or 3. I know the price of film in general has gone up. 50e for 3 rolls). I'm preparing a large project in Japan at the moment and I'm looking to buy 70 to 80 rolls of 35mm Portra 400. Posted by u/mural030 - 3 votes and 10 comments Idk if you’re US but if you are, manufacturing and supply chain are still a mess right now so as much I would love to throw a fit about a 15% price increase, I’m tempted to believe that’s Just The Way Things Are™️ right now 🤷🏻‍♂️ Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. (Portra 400; Olympus OM1-N; 55mm Olympus 1. It allows for faster shutter speeds (less stress and possible disappointment due to shaky photos) and more dynamic shooting (allowing to capture emotions and movement), too. It’s worth reviewing. In these two shots you’ve linked via Imgur, the contrast is very high and the dark shadows can get noisy in a scan. what the naysayers will tell you on reddit Worth it. first roll (kinda)! a little walk through sac. Has anyone got some experience about these two films when they are pushed? Or other film recommendation reasonable in price is also very welcome. I may only shoot Kodak TMAX 400 Kodak Portra 400 Cinestill 50D I am pretty happy with it - especially at the price point. The color profile of each one is totally up to your preference (I personally prefer portra 400, but Gold 200 is nice too). I don't know why this is downvoted, Proimage is clearly not an alternative to Portra 400. So, if you want to overexpose Portra 400 by 1 stop you want to set your camera's setting to 200 ISO. Im thinking about pushing Kodak Ultramax 400 to 800 or Fuji X-tra 400 to 800. It's everyone's favorite for a reason. For landscapey type things (especially night photos) I just like portra 400 better and I won’t be convinced otherwise. So this was shot on a Mamiya 645 on portra 400m, exposed for the mid-tones, maybe just slightly overexposed. 5 years ago and just loved the asthetic. 50e per roll (34. Portra 400 true ASA is more like 160 or 200 max, but is not like Portra 160 that has pastel colors. Hey, I feel like im losing my mind but has a 5 pack of Portra 400 always been around $170 CAD? Kodak Portra 400 Professional ISO 400, 35mm, 36 Exposures, Color Negative Film (5 Roll per Pack ) 3 Pack Cinestil 35mm 400 Dynamic Color Film (135, 36 EXP) 3-Pack Kodak Portra 400 35mm Film 2 Pack 36exp for 35mm Film Camera Kodak 35mm Film Roll Bundle - Kodak Film- Balveli Cloth - 35 mm Film Roll- Camera Film- 35mm Film Kodak- Kodak Film 35mm Jan 24, 2024 · Obviously, prices are different all over the world but Portra 800 is always more expensive than Portra 400. All you've done so far is overexpose the first 10 by 2 stops. The angle of the sun suggest it was late afternoon, so something like f8 for 1/100th and iso 100 sounds about right (sunny 16 -2 stops). Personally I can never seem to get pro400h to look right. Pic 2&3 is the real portra 400. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Less than a lot of things. 50e for 3 rolls) and Portra 800 is 13. This was the pricing from 2015 until 2020. It is fairly low saturation and low contrast. But the prices for film and c41 and E4 development is just killing my wallet. And much like Portra 400, its only real weakness is extreme low light. The price is great though if buy in bulk. I say if you want, rate the 160 at box speed, or 400 for just for a little more saturation. 4 ai-s lens is honestly incredible, especially for the price. I was looking at my B&H receipts and in 2019 I paid $34. Point is, Portra is shit expensive for me regardless. That 85mm 1. I understand that COVID caused a lot of inflation, but housing, cars, or groceries haven't doubled in price since 2019. That’s normal low-mid range price for medium resolution scans. 5, the dof is pretty shallow. Portra 400. An "Agfa Vista 400" expired in 2019 is just Fuji Superia X-TRA, which you can likely get fresh for much cheaper than even a single roll of Portra. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Portra 400 in stock at B&H! News/Article What was sane pricing for Portra. To my eye, this is a decent approximation of medium format Portra 400. If is the exposure was +1EV over the 400 box speed, then is not realy overxposed. A 100ft roll can easily do 18 rolls of 36exp, so if we take the price of the 100ft roll, and divide by 18 we get $8. com. 4 | Portra 400 4. I do have portra but I usually order from the states. This is my price book from either fall of '82 or spring '83, after the RZ had come out. Reply reply Hello, everyone! As I said, I'll be travelling to Varadero, Cuba (from Lisbon, Portugal) next week with Kodak Portra 400 film, and I could use some help. 4 is like 75% 🥲 The Agfa 400 roll expired 2019 Agfa went bust in 2005. The seller was keeping the film in a fridge. Lomo 400 and the new “Fujifilm” 400 are very similar if not the same or older versions. Fuji 400 is usually around $10 per roll. IMO, shoot the rest of the roll at 400, develop normally. 5 pack of 400 $60! Prices just keep going up Reddit admins The Portra 400 recipe is definitely my go-to in outdoor sunny scenes, but I’ve found it’s a little underwhelming indoors. The method I use is to white balance the film strip and then invert all the colour lor curves. My portra 400 recipe is still in development but I would say i’m 70-80% there in terms of certain qualities/traits. It's a little better price than B&H and Adorama. Do you think there is any store there that has this amount in stock in Tokyo and not for exorbitant prices? Other option would be to order everything in Switzerland and fly with it (but having to hand check the film at security in Zurich) Comparing Contax T2, Konica Big mini, Yashica T4D | Kodak Portra 400 and at that price it was 100% worth the money. It's vogue to hate popular things but portra is too good. [Olympus Trip 200, Portra 400] Makes a lot of sense now in 120, though. 4 Lens) The Moderator team continues to oppose For comparison, Portra 400 is 11. I've seen so many amazing results of Portra 400, those amazing colors, wide dynamic range, but my scans just don't have that same feeling/look. Roll of Portra costs about as much as two days’ worth of what I used to order at Starbucks every morning for a while. Having more diversity in the market as well as a speed more suited to general purpose shooting like vacations could go a long way. Portra 400 should be noticeably smoother than Ultramax, showing noticeably less grain, (not only from my experience but) indicated by Kodak’s print grain index. Portra 400 is the only other 400 speed color emulsion out there anymore and Lomo is a lot cheaper (50% or so here). I’m considering picking up a 85mm 1. 75 on B&H today, so almost double the price. But seriously, shoot some Kodak Gold if you haven’t in a while. I’ve heard that I should shoot it rated at 200, meter for the shadows, and open up 1-2 stops depending on sun in snowy conditions. Local camera shop restocked. Ask anything about analog photography in our weekly "ask anything" thread, or… Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Moab shot on Pentax K1000 | SMC Pentax-M 50mm F1. However, the new stuff on 135 is way more expensive. 4g lens though just because autofocus would be really nice, and my manual focus hit rate at 1. 1M subscribers in the analog community. Samples below scanned as individual frames via a Noritsu scanner and then stitched back together in PS. 400H would be the better choice but, well, you know. 8 is 3 stops faster than f8 and portra 400 is 2 stops faster than iso 100. Kodak price hike again upvotes Sure, but I can't even get Portra 400 for the new price of Lomo 800. 🏕️ Summer Camp. I shoot with a Canon 6D and find that the most realistic results come with using this preset coupled with the Film Extra Shadow tone curve. But that doesn't need to be Portra 400! Comparing my 250D shots (developed in ECN-2) vs Portra 400, I much prefer the 250D. Making the jump would probably take a massive investment on their part, and it's always a risk to their image when they're currently the manufacturer of the highest-quality B&W. Just noticed Amazon UK currently have a 5 pack of Portra 400 for £52. 5 Fisheye Portra 400 Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! Happy to hear thoughts on the lens or on alternatives at similar For example: if I were to shoot a color negative stock like Portra 400, I'd set the ISO to 200 with AE program mode. I'm planning on going to my home town which starts to get very sunny and bright this time of the year to get some shot of beach houses Willem Verbeeck style lmao (low saturation and a bit of overexposure). Both are heinously expensive right now, but the relative difference in price is appropriate in my opinion since Portra is technically better in pretty much every way (color, grain, latitude, dynamic range). If it's your first roll, shoot at 400, meter for the shadows. There isn't really a cheaper 120 color alternative to Portra 400. Every time your ISO doubles it's equivalent to 1 stop of light. Is it worth buying it, especially since I could get like 9 rolls of Kodak gold for that price. After that it's Fuji. Portra 400 is available at under $80 for a 5 pack pretty easily, so $16 per roll. To summarize, for same size print the print grain index of Gold 200 is 44 and Portra 400 is 37. Take a look a the PORTRA bottom right, every single letter is in the wrong angle, the 400 above cuts the dark purple/purple field at a few degrees when it should be parallel, the 135 top left is turned at least 4 degrees, and i am not allowed to say it? Id say go for it before prices go even higher! Scotland. A couple of scans from a series I just shot. That’s not a big difference but it can have an impact if you’re shooting a lot. I use considerably more 400 so it’s worth buying a five pack. Just bought this Bronica ETR at the regular asking price online. I also shoot it most consistently. With portra already being more money and hearing that Kodak will raise prices again in January I think I’ll give pro400h another try for portraits. We also love DIY boards; 3D printed, hand wired, whatever you have, we love the creativity of the community and the wonderful and amazing projects that are created every day. Is that correct? Used a Portra 400 at box speed. The important thing you need to remember here is there can be quite a difference between ISO 200 and 400 when shooting low light. Honestly I couldn't choose between 160, 400, and 800 for an objective best. The 2022 kodak film price increase is too much 1 roll of portra 400 is equal to 2 day of minimum wage in Thailand Just note for future - Kodak 200 is not a thing, you need to have something between name of the brand (Kodak) and the ISO (200 in this case - in the post I used Portra 400, so 400 is the ISO) which will actually be the name of the film. It is a great film and will handle the scenes very well. Ask anything about analog photography in our weekly "ask anything" thread, or share photos. 50e per roll (40. I rarely shoot Portra 400 in 35mm since there are quite a few more color negative alternatives. Imma need about ISO 800 film, turns out portra's price is a rocket through the sky and i cant afford that. I’m thinking of buying a five pack of Portra 160 for 65€. Thanks in advance! The easiest way to "push film" is by adjusting your ISO. When I got home I saw the exp dates are all 10/2021. Tips for "correctly" exposing Portra 400 [Portra 400, 35mm] Help Wanted Hey everyone, I am fairly new to shooting film and recently picked up my first roll of Portra 400 for a portrait shoot. Vision3 250D is closer, but still less sensitive and requires ECN-2 processing which is rarely available. So, let's do some extrapolation on price. Depending on what the scene was (perhaps common backlighting that could fool a meter), +2 may have even helped. I pushed Provia to 200 on my last vacation and it looked fine but having the flexibility of a 400 speed film would be better. Some of you have guessed right. Or check it out in the app stores   That's literally half the price/exp of Portra 400. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Bronica ETRS, 75mm 2. The same box sells for $64. It means you can overexpose quite a bit before color shifts, and it handle underexposure a bit better than cons Wow there’s a bit of wrong in there. Also don't expect these "magic tones" from the internet. Portra is designed primarily as a portrait film intended to give pleasing skin tones. This thread is archived (mainly for price and most likely Is $800 a good price for 2 used Technics SL 1200 MK3s? 5 rolls of Portra 400 in stock for USD 65 + shipping, in case anyone is interested. Then "Agfa" colour films were Ferrania Solaris until 2010. But in the past handful of weeks Portra 400 specifically has skyrocketed in… Being very expensive here in Italy (average portra 400 price is 14-15 euros) I want to know well both before buying. The cost of developing and scanning a roll of film is more than the cost of the film itself, so the overall difference in price (say, $4 film plus $20 develop and scan vs $7 film plus $20 develop and scan) is not great. Are the first 3 images acceptable results for a point and shoot? I’m spoiled by the sharpness of the last photo and wanted to see if anyone had thoughts on quality of my R1 This weekend I’m taking a short backpacking trip up a 6,000 footer on the east coast and will be dealing with snowy conditions. Absolute best case scenario is Portra 800 is 30% more expensive even after the Lomo price increase. Im planning to take a few rolls of Kodak Portra 400. I just got my scans back from the lab and some of them seem to be like this. 8 pancake) with Gold 200 (last image). Mar 24, 2011 · The new Portra 400 on 120 is the same as the old NC/VC in the UK. I really enjoy shooting it, but since I've become more budget conscious with film, I've been shooting much more Portra 160 lately, as well as some Ektar 100 — at least in 120. Something to keep in mind! Reply reply First time sharing on reddit. A few months ago, I shot a roll of Portra 400 on my Nikon F3, got it developed by a lab, and scanned the negatives myself. List price on left, actual sale price on right. This is all assuming Portra 400 and Program Mode. 8 / Kodak Portra 400 upvotes If you expose Portra 800 @400 you will get great results in my experience. Favorite stocks for me: -low speed C41: Ektar 100, love the colors -high speed C41: Portra 800 or 400 (400 pushed to 800 also gave me green results) -E6: Provia 100F, very versatile and a lot easier to shoot than Velvia, better color palette than E100 -BW low speed: Agfa APX 100, cheap, sharp and very nice tones -BW high speed: Kodak T-Max 400 So I thought I’d try to make it at least worth the price of admission and make a Portra 400 preset, something the gr2 can’t pull off in any meaningful way I’ve shot lots of Portra in my life, both personally and professionally. I switched to only film for about 1. Posted by u/hakuhonomawashi - 15 votes and 6 comments Pentax 67 35mm F4. It doesn’t feel correct or accurate to Portra in general. Gold is better in pretty much every way and especially in artificial lighting. Here in the UK, the price of Portra 800 is £24 a roll and Portra 400 is £22 a roll. At ISO 400, 1/500th, proper exposure would be at f/22 or possibly even f/32 given that you have a lot of bright sand and sky in the pic and the sunlight is very intense. I even bought an Epson v750 to try and scan myself… but vuescan’s Portra color profile hasn’t been updated in 20 years and it does an awful job. But generally yes, Portra 400 is designed to be shot at 400 and will give the most neutral results at this rating. 95. If you love vivid colours then no. For a 400 ISO C41 colour print film the only alternatives left now are Kodak Ultramax (What used to be Kodak Gold) or the Fuji Superia 400 (though prices of that appear to have gone through the roof). As the title says, I had the idea for an upcoming trip to shoot Portra 400 at 800, but to compensate for the extra stop of light, use a 1-stop ND filter during bright days to be able to shoot it in broad daylight. I have the xt5 I reached out to Fuji weekly and he told me these settings for portra 800 Classic Chrome Dynamic Range: DR400 Highlight: +1 Shadow: 0 Color: +3 Noise Reduction: -4 Sharpening: -2 Clarity: -4 Grain Effect: Strong, Large Color Chrome Effect: Strong Color Chrome Effect Blue: Off White Balance: 5200K, +1 Red & -5 Blue ISO: Auto, up to ISO 6400 Exposure I agree. 2017. 10 votes, 18 comments. Ask anything about analog photography in our weekly "ask anything" thread, or… Try portra 400 or even consider the 800 version. 5) with Portra 400 (first 3 images) vs Canon Rebel T2 (40mm 2. It's a kind of weird overexposed look (and not in a good way) that seems to have a general lack of contrast. 2. I rated it at 160 and got great results in my Minolta, and my Canon. If you want vivid in a colour negative film go with Ektar100. My personal fave to put through a point and shoot is Colorplus 200, which is similar to Fuji C200 in price and color. My go to is 400 just for where it sits in the range with exposure. The 800 was $19, and the 400 five pack was $79, so about $3 difference per roll, but for me it’s not the price difference that had me buying only one roll of 800. It's sad because portra is really expensive in Canada hence why i like using fuji film/lomo stuff. I'll be set for the holidays. Film photography subreddit. 3M subscribers in the analog community. For discussion of how to shoot film, buying advice, or what went wrong on your first roll head on over to /r/analogcommunity. sorry to ask this but is 18,90€ a good price for a five pack of portra 400 120 film? and what Portra 800 is granier than Portra 400 when both shot at box speed, although that is to be expected Portra 400 can expose at 800 and still deliver less grain than Portra 800 at box speed Portra can push to 1600 and still deliver less grain than Portra 800 at 1600 Portra 400 is made with Vision 3 technology, Portra 800 is not 2. Less than it used to cost me to go out to dinner. I’m sure you’ll be surprised how good it is and how close you can get it Portra 400. Some things really went up in 7 years! There may have been a big exchange rate shift between yen/dollar during that time. I scan at home with a DIY setup 😅 Use a Fujifilm XH1 and colour the negative using Lightroom. If I were to shoot in snowy conditions I'd shoot it at 100 as well. 8, Portra 400. Budget does not always mean "cheap", it means working within a reasonable price range but still using quality items, or the best available within that range. I’ve had the hardest time with Portra scans over the last year or two. The Vision3 films have finer and also smoother grain compared to the portra - even the 500T is finer and smoother despite the higher speed. Ricoh R1 (30mm 3. Firstly, you are not going to overexpose Portra 400 by rating it at EI 200. For what most people want from Portra 400 and with most post workflows, 320 is probably a better rating since it give a tat more saturation and contrast. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 95 for 5 rolls at filmphotographystore. Where can I find 35mm film (preferably Portra 400) in Reykjavik and what are the prices like Thanks much!!!! $59. As said in a previous post, i’ve been constructing, studying and searching for a great Portra 400 recipe for the GR iiix! Had a bit of a eureka moment when walking around a park a few weeks ago. I stick with Portra for three reasons: I want really nice scans. There's Portra 160 and Ektar 100 but these aren't 400 speed. A 400 speed slide film I think would really help increase slide film sales. Portra has great dynamic range. Pretty much just Ultramax 400. If I had to guess Id say the aperture was either 2. 400 will give you more scope in low light conditions. Hell, a box of just 5 reeds for my saxophone costs about twice as much as a roll of Portra and I’m lucky if 3 or 4 are actually /good/ reeds. 95 for a 5 roll box of Portra 400 120 film. If I were to shoot into the sun, I'd probably set it to 100. I’ve only shot Portra 160 as opposed to 400, just for the finer grain. On the Lisbon-Varadero flight I have emailed the airport asking for a hand-check on my film, which I think will be granted. is there anything i can do about this or is it just too late 😅😢. 99, and a 100ft roll of the same is $149. hello! during the airport x-ray security check, i placed my portra 400 into my bag and it went through the airport ct-920. true. I have to shoot more and experiment, but that’s my experience with 160 so far. However, my scans feel a bit "lifeless" and the colors feel off. Same, but less extensive, is in the Gold datasheet. Honestly people may disagree with me on this but Ultramax 400 ain’t bad ! 2. Secondly, "overexposing" color negative film by a stop or two doesn't desaturate colors, it tends to do the exact opposite - increasing saturation due to the increased density. // Lomo 100 Pushed +2 // Hexar AF 35mm & 50mm I was lucky cause in Canada im paying 10 CAD a roll for pro400h, 11 CAD for velvia 50/100 120, 11CAD for provia 50/100. Trying anything to avoid portra 400 prices. The Reddit home of Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now bargain price! Reply reply More replies BONUS: There is a Portra 400 shot and a Portra 400+1 shot The problem is they tried back in the 60's/70's, but their product wasn't great compared to Kodak. Ultramax 400 is a decent cheaper 35mm color film, as is Superia 400 but they dont have the same color profile as Portra 400. Anyone else have this little camera? Highly recommended for anyone looking for something fun to shoot. As above - Portra is a professional film and you're paying professional prices (and always have done). Labs just screw up the color every time. A subreddit dedicated solely to the buying, selling and trading of San Pedro cactus and any other species of Trichocereus. Before analog prices This is one of those film myths that just refuses to die. My lab is $10 for development and $25 for scanning in highest resolution (4000 by 4000 for 120 film) and tiff files, or $30+ for Imacon scanner that can give even higher resolution. 90% is done in the curve unless I need to bring up or down the exposure a little bit. Most FD lenses have a minimum aperture of f/16, so you're probably overexposed by 1-2 stops. Archived post. Basically title--had an opportunity to buy a few boxes of portra 400 at a reasonable price, which is rare in my area right now. 11 votes, 15 comments. If it was average sce 1983 RB/RZ prices. afa ocqwj pfg bqafjny mkawbc xcfgxhh wdjxqw lddex ymk xubtpiv evae duqhj aulx dkttnf nvdql